Home
Theme
Archive
PLOT TWIST!!! Anthony is a girl!
Hello there, the name is Anthony, I'm a 21 year old female who may spend too much time online and drawing.

I reblog a lot of pointless crap on here solely because I enjoy it. I also will post sketches, artwork, and the works. You can find it under my art tag.
149,933 notes8.318:20 PMsource

huntail:

catpuppys:

this guy could be the last airbender tbh

he can airbend me over a table

71,253 notes8.308:12 PMsource

dinoduckqueen:

hawkules:

imagine a video game where you create a hero whose destiny is to save everyone, but throughout the game you start making harder and more questionable decisions, and the game gets darker and darker. and in the end you’re just standing there, clutching the controller and finally realizing you were playing the villain all along

fuck

FUCK

FUCK

456,243 notes8.308:10 PMsource

awidesetvagina:

this is still the best story ever told at a talk show

375,051 notes8.308:07 PMsource

vinegod:

Didn’t see that one coming by Thomas Sanders

266,676 notes8.308:06 PMsource

This scene is so frustrating.

18,903 notes8.308:06 PMsource
philliplight:

I read Neil Gaiman’s “Stardust” recently and doodled the severely pissed off and feisty fallen star, Yvaine.

philliplight:

I read Neil Gaiman’s “Stardust” recently and doodled the severely pissed off and feisty fallen star, Yvaine.

5,187 notes8.308:01 PMsource

woke-up-on-derse:

ghostystar:

imagine how different your life would be if you had complete and unrestricted access to all the clothes you wanted and no limitations on wearing them

imagine how confident everyone would be. it’d be beautiful 

100,255 notes8.308:00 PMsource
doyouwannabuildasnowman:

invanity-wetrust:

ticklesthesomething:

geminihoneybee:

olitwist:

toluicacid:

pink-nation-xoxo:

disney-rapunzel-merida-vanellope:

Let’s give a moment to those mothers that can not have a child…

and to the husbands that stick by their wives regardless of wether they can have a child

This was the most realistic Disney movie ever.

yeah the part where the house flies off due to a bunch of balloons was very realistic 



Actually they consulted an architect about how many balloons exactly it would take to do that to a house of that exact size and weight. They calculated that moment using a physics engine and took everything into account. Unless a professional architect as well as all of the physics professors who put their effort into that highly advanced physics engine are wrong, that take off was actually very doable and scientifically accurate.

GET WRECKED SON

It just got better

Well someone is about to get wrecked because, yes Pixar did figure out an estimation on how many balloons it would take to lift Carl’s house. And what was that number? Oh about 23.5-26 MILLION balloons. This with your typical party balloons.  Wired magazine apparently estimated it would take over 100,000 balloons if you used 3 foot diameter balloons which would be made from a stronger, more durable material. If the house had weighed about 100,000 pounds. But no where did Pixar ever use that amount of balloons in their sequences. Numbers being dropped online said that Pixar had used 20,622 balloons for the liftoff sequence, and most of the other scenes used only 10,297 balloons.
A little over 10,000 balloons may be able to get an adult on the small side off the ground. Mythbusters had done an experiment to see how many balloons it would take a little kid off the ground. I think a four year old? They had estimated it would take 2,000 balloons, and yet it took over 3,000 balloons! They didn’t even give the full number. And they had to hustle because they estimated the balloons would have 6 hours of flying time before helium would begin to seep out of the balloons (these being your regular latex party balloons.)
TLDR; So no, the liftoff scene is not possible.
-MIC DROPPED-
Read This, And This, And Watch This Cause Mythbusters

doyouwannabuildasnowman:

invanity-wetrust:

ticklesthesomething:

geminihoneybee:

olitwist:

toluicacid:

pink-nation-xoxo:

disney-rapunzel-merida-vanellope:

Let’s give a moment to those mothers that can not have a child…

and to the husbands that stick by their wives regardless of wether they can have a child

This was the most realistic Disney movie ever.

yeah the part where the house flies off due to a bunch of balloons was very realistic 

Actually they consulted an architect about how many balloons exactly it would take to do that to a house of that exact size and weight. They calculated that moment using a physics engine and took everything into account. Unless a professional architect as well as all of the physics professors who put their effort into that highly advanced physics engine are wrong, that take off was actually very doable and scientifically accurate.

GET WRECKED SON

It just got better

Well someone is about to get wrecked because, yes Pixar did figure out an estimation on how many balloons it would take to lift Carl’s house. And what was that number? Oh about 23.5-26 MILLION balloons. This with your typical party balloons.  Wired magazine apparently estimated it would take over 100,000 balloons if you used 3 foot diameter balloons which would be made from a stronger, more durable material. If the house had weighed about 100,000 pounds. But no where did Pixar ever use that amount of balloons in their sequences. Numbers being dropped online said that Pixar had used 20,622 balloons for the liftoff sequence, and most of the other scenes used only 10,297 balloons.

A little over 10,000 balloons may be able to get an adult on the small side off the ground. Mythbusters had done an experiment to see how many balloons it would take a little kid off the ground. I think a four year old? They had estimated it would take 2,000 balloons, and yet it took over 3,000 balloons! They didn’t even give the full number. And they had to hustle because they estimated the balloons would have 6 hours of flying time before helium would begin to seep out of the balloons (these being your regular latex party balloons.)

TLDR; So no, the liftoff scene is not possible.

-MIC DROPPED-

Read This, And This, And Watch This Cause Mythbusters

636,121 notes8.305:53 PMsource

micdotcom:

Under Armour’s breathtaking new ad stars a completely different type of athlete

Misty Copeland is a prima ballerina. She’s also the face of Under Armour’s stunning new ad campaign.

Under Armour, which typically features commercials starring bulky football players and track stars, has pegged Copeland to be the face of its new “I Will What I Want” campaign, a play on the brand’s “I Will” tagline. It’s part of their big push into womenswear.

But it’s revolutionary for several reasons | Follow micdotcom 

5,813 notes8.304:13 PMsource